|Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] To SVN or not to SVN: is that the question?|
+1, and as a lead for one still using svn (TCF), I plan on moving it to git in the next week or so. Doug. > -----Original Message----- > From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Wayne Beaton > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 3:18 PM > To: eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] To SVN or not to SVN: is that the > question? > > Is it time to start thinking about deprecating SVN? > > We almost never create new projects that use SVN; I'm thinking that it's time > to remove it as an option in the New Project Provisioning Request form. i.e. > all new project will be compelled to use Git. > > Note that this is a different discussion from that of asking existing SVN-based > projects to move. But, I guess, that conversation can't be too far behind. > > Thoughts? Concerns? Issues? > > Wayne > > -- > Wayne Beaton > The Eclipse Foundation > Twitter: @waynebeaton > > _______________________________________________ > eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list eclipse.org-architecture- > council@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council > > IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to > the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must > contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
Back to the top