Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] PMC Approval Lag?

[Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>]

There are discussions about bringing projects under the CDT. That way I can track things that I have more knowledge about (and care about for that matter). Other than that, no, it's what I meant by "little anyone wants to do about it". Technology benefits from an foundation staffer managing it, Tools is pure volunteer with little vested interest above everything else we volunteer for and have vested interest in.

On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Oisin Hurley <oisin.hurley@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Tools is dysfunctional. There's no if, ands, or buts about it. There seems
> to be little anyone wants to do about it. So it is what it is, for now.

Have there been any proposals to change that state of affairs?

 --oh

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.