Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Agenda for Thursday Meeting

[Cédric Brun <cedric.brun@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Martin,

I talked about that to Ed, Sven should be at the meeting today too, 
that will make 2 backup representations for the overall Modeling project.
That said, I'm not sure that's official as long as Ed did not stated
anything on a public channel.

Cédric

Oberhuber, Martin a écrit :
> Thanks Gunnar,
>
> I added this as an item for our monthly meeting on Thursday.
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Architecture_Council/Meetings/May_14_2009
>
> The 2nd item for Thursday is API Deprecation: I'd like to 
> encourage all AC members read up on that topic as a base
> for discussion.
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=261544
>
> Feel free to add other items to the agenda.
>
> I know I've still got the action item for documenting bugzilla
> best practices from our last meeting on the Wiki -- will do
> until Thursday.
>
> Cedric, and Tom: Have you talked to your respective PMC's about
> making your representation official?
>
> Talk you on Thursday,
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
> Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
>  
>  
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
>> On Behalf Of Gunnar Wagenknecht
>> Sent: Montag, 11. Mai 2009 20:06
>> To: eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Re: Eclipse 
>> Repository BestPractices
>>
>> Hi AC,
>>
>> Bug 249745 ([1], Eclipse Repository Best Practices) is 
>> currently marked
>> as a blocker for bug 257706 ([2], Host a git repository...). I wonder
>> what the status here is.
>>
>> I also wonder if we as the AC should put this onto our agenda and come
>> to a conclusion as this one. I can see two solutions:
>>
>> (A) Recommend X as the new SCM and recommend deprecating Y and Z.
>> (B) Don't do anything but keep Y and Z.
>>
>> Both would require formalizing a statement and putting the bug into a
>> RESOLVED state. Based on this, the blocking issue could be addressed.
>>
>> Note, I'm not saying that our decision has to be final. I'd 
>> see it as a
>> signal to people telling them that we are actually moving 
>> forward (a bit).
>>
>> -Gunnar
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=249745
>> [2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=257706
>>
>> -- 
>> Gunnar Wagenknecht
>> gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://wagenknecht.org/
>> _______________________________________________
>> eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
>> eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architect
>> ure-council
>>
>> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes 
>> internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently 
>> removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to 
>> request removal.
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
>
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
>
>