Georg's points make a lot of sense to me and I believe he has a strong
basis for making them --- semantic web and information management is
his business. Google has clearly stated that they are looking to hold
and manage all information possible. Information is king. Amazing
things can be learned from disjoint pieces of information. I'm not
paranoid but I do manage my personal information quite closely.
Having said that, managing and exposing the intentionally public set of
meeting times in Google calendar does not seem to represent any undue
risk or loss of control. This is not private, personal or particularly
valuable information. Nor are people interested in search for the
individual items (they want to find the calendar not the invite for the
meeting that was on Oct 9). It is simply a convenient and timely way
to broadcast and make available meeting times that we want everyone to
know anyway. I would suggest that we not even bother with acceptances
etc. They just generate spam and add no real value.
Jeff
Ed Merks wrote:
Georg,
Comments below.
August Georg Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
today in the AC meeting we
have had a request
for using Google calendar for managing the meeting and the attendees.
Generally the usage of such
tools has
several drawbacks from my point of view.
1.
We add
structured information
to Google, when we are doing something.
They are moving strongly into our life and they are extreme collecting
our data
and behavior in the web. I dislike that point. With this information a
lot of
wrong things could be made.
This is a personal perspective. Most of us don't view Google as
something to avoid.
2.
The search in
our WIKI is
negatively affected.
You are not able to search on this type of content… e.g. an example is
the calendar on the AC page.
There is no other good public calendar solution...
I don’t want to add further
work to
ones task. And I do not have an idea yet, how to reduce the amount of
time that
has to be invested without such a tool for coordination.
I get very frustrated these days when a note gets sent to dozens of
people and each must separately enter calendar information. Surely we
all have better things to do that worry about Google using our Calendar
data for nefarious purposes. Eclipse is a public organization that
does things in a transparent way.
Therefore I would vote with
0
on such a
point.
Generally I would add a
comment of moving
this information out of our control.
I just don't understand this "control" issue...
As we move more and more
information out of
our IT system the usage of search or similar features is getting more
and more
complex on our data. As a result the only chance to get access to the
content is
the use of a spider to crawl the website. This crawler would be used
for
creating a search index or similar. If we want to improve access to
information
in our IT systems – like wiki or other page content – we should be
in control of our data.
Yet we aren't. It's hard to find anything. I really don't need
hard-to-find calendar data.
If not, accessing the real
content we would always have
the issue on making a decision, what is real and what is just
navigational (or
similar) data. Access to the content is therefore much more complex and
that
could affect the abilities of search algorithms.
Search or other knowledge
management
features… as categorization, content based routing, search and many
more will
get more and more complex or may work not optimal.
I'm not sure if we're still talking about knowing when a meeting takes
place or something more detailed (though also very public).
From my point of view we
should keep control
on such data. This would give us options for flexible operations with
our
content.
I think our data is way too hard to find as it is, and that focusing on
a way to avoid Google as a way to manage our calendars, when Google and
any other entity in the works can and already does scan and index all
our very public web pages anyway, is futile exercise. :-(
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
|