Yes, the EMO (me) manages those names (using the Eclipse Top-Level
Project naming conventions http://wiki.eclipse.org/Naming_Conventions),
but only when a project team asks me about the names they should use.
If they just check in code without asking, I don't see it and thus am
unable to comment. I have entered a bug about monitoring this:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=219259
David M Williams wrote:
But, I can't find in writing where
that's
said (that the EMO owns and assigns them) and in fact, according to a
note
in
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project_provisioning_request.php
it sounds pretty much left up to who
ever fills out the form to get a project provisioned. (if that document
is still current).
But the form generates an email that I review and (often) modify before
the project is actually provisioned. So there is some small amount of
control.
So, I nominate John to
head up this
subcommittee to be formed by 3 or 4 people he chooses, and to be a
rotating
assignment. :)
Their first task would be to draft a
short document on their role, and how to fit into the "project
provisioning"
process ... that we could all discuss and vote to agreement, and then
off
they'd go.
Sounds like a good idea to me.
|
