We need to understand the nature of these changes. It is too late for us to be taking new versions of *anything* that could bust our stability or invalidate our testing.
ECF team, please elucidate.
McQ.
Pascal Rapicault---04/06/2009 16:44:48---I have compared the new contribution with the one from May 27th and have found 3 code changes in three plugins that *are* affec
From: |
Pascal Rapicault/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA |
To: |
"Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Cc: |
platform-releng-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx, eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
04/06/2009 16:44 |
Subject: |
Re: [platform-releng-dev] Re: [eclipse-pmc] Fw: [p2-dev] Request for inclusion of new version of ECF |
I have compared the new contribution with the one from May 27th and have found 3 code changes in three plugins that *are* affected by the platform
ContainerFactory in org.eclipse.ecf
Activator in org.eclipse.ecf.identity
AbstractRetrieveFileTransfer org.eclipse.ecf.provider.filetransfer
>The changes in ECF do not affect the bundles used by the platform
Who do I trust? Now I'm worried.
Is there a bug report backing any of these changes? Why now?
PaScaL
Jeff McAffer ---06/04/2009 04:18:57 PM---+1
From: |
Jeff McAffer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
To: |
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Cc: |
"Eclipse platform release engineering list." <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
06/04/2009 04:18 PM |
Subject: |
[platform-releng-dev] Re: [eclipse-pmc] Fw: [p2-dev] Request for inclusion of new version of ECF |
+1
The changes in ECF do not affect the bundles used by the platform. The only reason we have to get a new contirbutuion is because the qualifiers changed. That issue will be addressed in ECF build in the future. This will be the last ECF contribution related to the platform's use.
Jeff
Pascal Rapicault wrote:
|