[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ecf-dev] Turn off CVS
- From: Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:24:45 +0100
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=F5QVbAj1fHzmW+UkTzeRUj9drhbrv/QpIBMCyhrtlGWu7gOnpwZxwJUCgHVgWFIO5h YbDY7G1q8KXRsXu4zGQitF9smE2NBydf0/QDWbXUZFuWfRBFbb0KzcAle7TSMbmgotLX oVUOK+E7KXyfeD+5yoUv017e6cAWKIZn/8L6c=
like everything, that depends. if the examples are broken then yes. Currently they are not. Also, examples come with some text in a blog or whatever. It is confusing if the examples differ from the description in that text. So, as long as they are not broken, I do not see the harm.
Eventually, e.g. when git psf support arrives, this can be replaced.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Markus Alexander Kuppe <email@example.com>
On 11/10/2010 09:42 AM, Wim Jongman wrote:Won't this cause people to use outdated examples which is IMO worse than
> Maybe we should leave the examples be and remove the rest. some PSF
> files point to the examples.
a broken .psf.