Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ecf-dev] Re: [riena-dev] Riena Update


I looked at this and I see what you are getting at. True connectionless protocols are based on UDP or IP. As soon as you have TCP/IP you have a connection. ok.

So I think what I meant was a protocol that does not have a persistent connection. So a connection that is kept over the lifecyle of the service proxy and is not closed after each remote service invocation.

So R-OSGi, the generic server provider and also XMPP over a XMPP server, they are all holding on to a persistent connection all the time independant of the remote service calls you are making ?

right ?


Am 13.01.2009 um 18:13 schrieb Scott Lewis:

Hi Christian,

Christian Campo wrote:
Hi Jan,

thanks. So that would mean you have a connected socket between the
various spaces all the time. So the point from the discussion with
Scott that I think that this make R-OSGi a connectionoriented provider and not a connectionless provider. I am not saying this is good or bad

Like with Webservices (say SOAP or any other protocol) over HTTP its
possible to reuse a connected socket but typically you disconnect
after each call and connect for the next one.

Is that the correct assumption Jan ?

So that makes me still wonder if there is an ECF provider currently
available that is connectionless ?

By this definition of connectionless, not currently.  So perhaps Riena
can/will/should be the first?


ecf-dev mailing list

Back to the top