Re: [dtp-dev] SQL Parser Extension Home

[Anil Samuel <anil.samuel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

that seem like a cyclic dependency; i imagine DBDefinition and  
Modelbase to be on top of the dependency chain followed by  
Connectivity, SQL Tools (incl. parser).

Anthos
On 14/11/2006, at 6:59 AM, rcernich@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> This question came up during our API review, where should the SQL  
> parser
> extension live?  The legacy SQM code from WTP/RDB contained a  
> sqlParser
> extension point which was accessible from the DatabaseDefinition,  
> so the
> real question is, should this relationship be maintained for the  
> new SQL
> parser framework?
>
> For 1.0, the connectivity project will not be declaring this extension
> point as public API.
>
> I've created a BZ entry for discussion purposes.
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=164382
>
> Regards,
> Rob Cernich
> DTP Connectivity Project Lead
>
> _______________________________________________
> dtp-dev mailing list
> dtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dtp-dev