Re: [dsdp-pmc] [CQ 2766] NAB demo player

[Shigeki Moride <moride@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Doug, PMC,

I'm little bit confusing about IP procedure. But, let me go as step by
step.

So,
We got vote for NAB demo-player.
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/dsdp-pmc/msg01575.html

Now, please approve MWT libraries as "non-exempt pre-req".
MWT is a "run-time" multi-platform GUI library that is distributed from
WideStudio.org.
http://www.widestudio.org
MWT is licensed under X11/MIT license.
The application build by NAB is require MWT libraries.


Please vote this.


Shigeki





Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:51:26 -0700
"Gaff, Doug" <doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Shigeki,
> 
> I just reread this ipzilla thread. Let me explain what Sharon is asking
> for.
> 
> 1) In Comment #29, the PMC voted to allow a "non-exempt pre-req" for NAB
> demo player to the MWT libraries:
> 
> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/dsdp-pmc/msg01575.html
> 
> 2) This requires that you enter a second CQ for the MWT libraries. (The
> second CQ isn't for Wide Studio. Sharon appears to be confused. Instead
> it's specifically for the libraries the player depends on.) Even though
> the libraries are not distributed with the demo player via Eclipse, the
> IP process requires that non-exempt pre-requisite dependencies be
> approved by the IP team.
> 
> Can you follow up on this and create the separate CQ for review?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Doug
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 3:14 PM
> To: dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [dsdp-pmc] [CQ 2766] NAB demo player
> 
> http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2766
> 
> 
> Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>            Severity|under_review                |awaiting_pmc
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Comment #36 from Sharon Corbett <sharon.corbett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 2009-04-21 15:13:25 ---
> Following up on CQ:
> 
> As per the Eclipse Dependency Policy
> (http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_Policy_and_Procedure_for_3
> rd_Party_Dependencies_Final.pdf)
> please see the following section:
> 
> b. If a pre-req is non-exempt, it must go through the IP review process
> and be
> approved or
> non-approved for use as a pre-req.
> 
> During the review of this content, and subsequent conversations, it was
> determined that a CQ would need to entered for WideStudio.  I do not
> believe a
> CQ has been entered to date. 
> 
> As a result, I am placing this CQ into "awaiting pmc" in order to follow
> up on
> the Widestudio CQ.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sharon
> 
> Auto-Generated Text:  IPTeam awaiting response from PMC.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the CQ.
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-pmc mailing list
> dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-pmc mailing list
> dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
> 

--
Shigeki Moride
moride.shigeki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
moride@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx