Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [dsdp-dd-dev] Is there any need for a multi-Container MI implementation?

Le lundi 17 mars 2008 à 14:26 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 05:39:00PM +0100, Frederic RISS wrote:
> > >From what I gathered here and there, CodeSourcery develops non-stop
> > thread debugging for GDB. Don't know if it's directly related to the
> > Ericson people participating here, but if it's the case I think there're
> > quite some similarities with our usage.
> Yes, we're working with Ericsson on non-stop and multi-process
> debugging.  The usage model is somewhat different than what you're
> doing; there will be a single debugger, and a single MI stream.  But
> most commands do need to take a thread/process parameter in this new
> model and we're still exploring exactly how it will fit together.

Yes, the usage model is different. I was talking about potential
similarities in the DSF modifiactions that might be needed. 


Back to the top