Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [dsdp-dd-dev] Is there any need for a multi-Container MI implementation?

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 05:39:00PM +0100, Frederic RISS wrote:
> >From what I gathered here and there, CodeSourcery develops non-stop
> thread debugging for GDB. Don't know if it's directly related to the
> Ericson people participating here, but if it's the case I think there're
> quite some similarities with our usage.

Yes, we're working with Ericsson on non-stop and multi-process
debugging.  The usage model is somewhat different than what you're
doing; there will be a single debugger, and a single MI stream.  But
most commands do need to take a thread/process parameter in this new
model and we're still exploring exactly how it will fit together.

(I've nothing useful to say about your actual DSDP questions, but I'll
watch with interest :-)

Daniel Jacobowitz

Back to the top