|Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ready for our yearly final daze?|
On 2011-06-07 02:20, Miles Parker wrote:
Anyway, the suggestion was to use the form "x.y.zRCn" and then simply do bare "x.y.z" for a release build. That's what I did for our 0.8.0 release.
The form x.y.zRCn is not a valid OSGi version. You must have three segments that are numeric so the form would be x.y.z.RCn.Assuming that's what you meant, stripping of the RCn part is very bad since it will make your version lexically smaller which means that the p2 resolver will select the release candidate instead of the release if it encounters both. You *must* retain a qualifier and it *must* be lexically greater than any qualifier used prior to the release.
Back to the top