[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Three points about this discussion
|
OK, I lied about being finished with the conversation...but that's
Bjorn's fault (as is everything else ;).
Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote:
Scott,
Ah, so then you are saying that the Galileo user community is the
community you want to attract - good, because then you'll want to
conform to those must-do items that the Galileo user community wants.
Yes, of course...and that's why (for my project at least) we have
been/are conforming to the must-do (and many most of the should do) items.
But I would question the assumption that what the Galileo user community
wants is the *additional/new* must do rules being proposed. Perhaps
some in the community, but I don't see any requests at the ECF level
(i.e. in newsgroups, mailing lists, etc) for ECF's plan.xml (even though
there), while I see a good deal of requests of the nature: "I didn't
know there was a project like this at EF?...do you all have X?" (and
when answer is 'yes'...)..."what do I have to do to get it?"
And the Planning Council has/is debating what those are, hence the
must-do and should-do items.
Good. I think they should keep debating about the must-dos (and perhaps
make the debate larger/involving more people).
Scott