Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ganymede M5 problems

Title: New Page 1
it actually looks like the schudle has been just fine.
I should have written "It's a pity that I did not start trying to get Ganymede as a whole earlier".
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member

From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bjorn Freeman-Benson
Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2008 17:43
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Ganymede M5 problems

Hmm - it looks to me that we're right on schedule vis a vis what we had decided for all the +1s, +2s, etc. The schedule says: "M5 +3 20 Feb" (yesterday) and we had a green build yesterday so are you suggesting that the schedule should have been more aggressive?

Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
it's a pity that it took so long until a green build was available.

[end of message]

Back to the top