[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 7:15 AM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] Europa Fall Maintenance
David's concern, are you all confident that the contributions from these eight
projects will work together without any kind of coordinated testing? Usually
there is staging of releases from +0/+1/+2 projects so that each project has
some time to test their changes against their dependencies. Is the plan this
time just to stir the pot until the build light turns green and then slap it on
the download page/update site? Has everyone upgraded their plugin/feature
versions correctly so that the users who have already downloaded the original
Europa Fall Maintenance will be able to update correctly? What will the new
release be called?
Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
project issues" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[cross-project-issues-dev] Europa Fall
for a one-time update.
(Wiki?) we should document what projects put what
into the update and why. Ideally that document would
have links to release notes holding lists of bugs fixed for the
respectively. Comparing with the Europa build-home CVS
of Oct. 1st, it looks like the following projects contributed:
DSDP-TM, DTP, ECF, EP, MDT-EODM, MDT-UML2Tools, STP
make a start for DSDP-TM, what we currently deliver to Europa
our build M20071030-2030 with build notes and bug lists here:
bugs were fixed in 5 patched plugins out of 63 total
critical fixes, 5 major, 11 lighter regressions, 6 other).
we decide on an Europa FM+ release, I'd rename our M-build to TM 126.96.36.199
order to indicate the more official status.
BTW, I don't think we affect the EPP packages.
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bjorn
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:35 PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Europa Fall Maintenance Maintenance
Europa Project Leads,
Please vote, on this mailing list, whether we should be updating the Europa
Update Site and the Europa download site with the re-re-spin. It appears that
individual projects have decided to update their bits (that's fine) and the
Europa download packages are being updated (did we agree to that?), so perhaps
we'd all better just vote +1 on this re-re-spin for the Europa Fall Maintenance
to be moved to be the main Europa update site.
I'll take three or more +1s and no -1s by Friday morning as a go.
@ALL: How do we proceed with the Europa Update Site content? From my point
view there is too much confusion, no clear decision, no schedule, and no
green build at all.
P.S. The lack of a green build is that annoying siteArchiver/update manager bug
that corrupts pack200 files. The non-packed files seem good and (when I get a
moment) I'm working on the work-around temp fix.
[end of message]_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list