RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] Europa Fall Maintenance Maintenance
To repeat David's concern, are you all
confident that the contributions from these eight projects will work together
without any kind of coordinated testing? Usually there is staging of releases
from +0/+1/+2 projects so that each project has some time to test their
changes against their dependencies. Is the plan this time just to stir
the pot until the build light turns green and then slap it on the download
page/update site? Has everyone upgraded their plugin/feature versions
correctly so that the users who have already downloaded the original Europa
Fall Maintenance will be able to update correctly? What will the new release
+1 for a one-time update.
Somewhere (Wiki?) we should document
what projects put what
versions into the update and why.
Ideally that document would
also have links to release notes
holding lists of bugs fixed for the
versions respectively. Comparing
with the Europa build-home CVS
version of Oct. 1st, it looks
like the following projects contributed:
Buckminster, DSDP-TM, DTP, ECF,
EP, MDT-EODM, MDT-UML2Tools, STP
To make a start for DSDP-TM, what
we currently deliver to Europa
is our build M20071030-2030 with
build notes and bug lists here:
26 bugs were fixed in 5 patched
plugins out of 63 total
(4 critical fixes, 5 major, 11
lighter regressions, 6 other).
If we decide on an Europa FM+
release, I'd rename our M-build to TM 22.214.171.124
in order to indicate the more
And, BTW, I don't think we affect
the EPP packages.
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/31/2007 09:05 AM
Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|"Cross project issues" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] Europa
Fall Maintenance Maintenance|
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bjorn
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:35 PM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Europa Fall Maintenance Maintenance
Europa Project Leads,
Please vote, on this mailing list, whether we should be updating the Europa
Update Site and the Europa download site with the re-re-spin. It appears
that individual projects have decided to update their bits (that's fine)
and the Europa download packages are being updated (did we agree to that?),
so perhaps we'd all better just vote +1 on this re-re-spin for the Europa
Fall Maintenance to be moved to be the main Europa update site.
I'll take three or more +1s and no -1s by Friday morning as a go.
@ALL: How do we proceed with the Europa Update Site
content? From my point of
view there is too much confusion, no clear decision, no schedule, and no
green build at all.
P.S. The lack of a green build is that annoying siteArchiver/update
manager bug that corrupts pack200 files. The non-packed files seem good
and (when I get a moment) I'm working on the work-around temp fix.
[end of message]_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list