Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] Europa Fall Maintenance Maintenance

To repeat David's concern, are you all confident that the contributions from these eight projects will work together without any kind of coordinated testing? Usually there is staging of releases from +0/+1/+2 projects so that each project has some time to test their changes against their dependencies. Is the plan this time just to stir the pot until the build light turns green and then slap it on the download page/update site?  Has everyone upgraded their plugin/feature versions correctly so that the users who have already downloaded the original Europa Fall Maintenance will be able to update correctly? What will the new release be called?

"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

10/31/2007 09:05 AM

Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

"Cross project issues" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] Europa Fall        Maintenance Maintenance

+1 for a one-time update.
Somewhere (Wiki?) we should document what projects put what
versions into the update and why. Ideally that document would
also have links to release notes holding lists of bugs fixed for the
versions respectively. Comparing with the Europa build-home CVS
version of Oct. 1st, it looks like the following projects contributed:
Buckminster, DSDP-TM, DTP, ECF, EP, MDT-EODM, MDT-UML2Tools, STP
To make a start for DSDP-TM, what we currently deliver to Europa
is our build M20071030-2030 with build notes and bug lists here:
26 bugs were fixed in 5 patched plugins out of 63 total
(4 critical fixes, 5 major, 11 lighter regressions, 6 other).
If we decide on an Europa FM+ release, I'd rename our M-build to TM
in order to indicate the more official status.
And, BTW, I don't think we affect the EPP packages.

Martin Oberhuber
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member


From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bjorn Freeman-Benson
Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:35 PM
Cross project issues
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Europa Fall Maintenance Maintenance

Europa Project Leads,
Please vote, on this mailing list, whether we should be updating the Europa Update Site and the Europa download site with the re-re-spin. It appears that individual projects have decided to update their bits (that's fine) and the Europa download packages are being updated (did we agree to that?), so perhaps we'd all better just vote +1 on this re-re-spin for the Europa Fall Maintenance to be moved to be the main Europa update site.

I'll take three or more +1s and no -1s by Friday morning as a go.

@ALL: How do we proceed with the Europa Update Site content? From my point of
view there is too much confusion, no clear decision, no schedule, and no
green build at all.

P.S. The lack of a green build is that annoying siteArchiver/update manager bug that corrupts pack200 files. The non-packed files seem good and (when I get a moment) I'm working on the work-around temp fix.
[end of message]_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list

Back to the top