To repeat David's concern, are you all confident that the
contributions from these eight projects will work together without any
kind of coordinated testing? Usually there is staging of releases from
+0/+1/+2 projects so that each project has some time to test their
changes against their dependencies. Is the plan this time just to stir
the pot until the build light turns green and then slap it on the
download page/update site? Has everyone upgraded their plugin/feature
versions correctly so that the users who have already downloaded the
original Europa Fall Maintenance will be able to update correctly?
What will the new release be called?
*"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>*
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/31/2007 09:05 AM
Please respond to
Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
"Cross project issues" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] Europa Fall Maintenance
Maintenance
+1 for a one-time update.
Somewhere (Wiki?) we should document what projects put what
versions into the update and why. Ideally that document would
also have links to release notes holding lists of bugs fixed for the
versions respectively. Comparing with the Europa build-home CVS
version of Oct. 1st, it looks like the following projects contributed:
Buckminster, DSDP-TM, DTP, ECF, EP, MDT-EODM, MDT-UML2Tools, STP
To make a start for DSDP-TM, what we currently deliver to Europa
is our build M20071030-2030 with build notes and bug lists here:
_http://download.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/downloads/drops/M20071030-2030/buildNotes.php_
26 bugs were fixed in 5 patched plugins out of 63 total
(4 critical fixes, 5 major, 11 lighter regressions, 6 other).
If we decide on an Europa FM+ release, I'd rename our M-build to TM
2.0.1.1
in order to indicate the more official status.
And, BTW, I don't think we affect the EPP packages.
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member_
__http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm_
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of
*Bjorn Freeman-Benson*
Sent:* Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:35 PM*
To:* Cross project issues*
Subject:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Europa Fall Maintenance
Maintenance
Europa Project Leads,
Please vote, on this mailing list, whether we should be updating the
Europa Update Site and the Europa download site with the re-re-spin.
It appears that individual projects have decided to update their bits
(that's fine) and the Europa download packages are being updated (did
we agree to that?), so perhaps we'd all better just vote +1 on this
re-re-spin for the Europa Fall Maintenance to be moved to be the main
Europa update site.
I'll take three or more +1s and no -1s by Friday morning as a go.
@ALL: How do we proceed with the Europa Update Site content? From my
point of
view there is too much confusion, no clear decision, no schedule, and no
green build at all.
P.S. The lack of a green build is that annoying siteArchiver/update
manager bug that corrupts pack200 files. The non-packed files seem
good and (when I get a moment) I'm working on the work-around temp fix.
--
[end of message]_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev