Re: [config-dev] [External] : [BALLOT] Tree structure vs flat structure

[Mark Struberg <struberg@xxxxxxxxxx>]

of course we should provide support for tree structured configuration and make it atomically accessible via POJOs, Interfaces and/or records.

+1

next up: discuss how the API, SPI and underlying mechanisms and design should work and look like.

LieGrue,

strub

Am 14.12.2021 um 10:46 schrieb Dmitry Kornilov <dmitry.kornilov@xxxxxxxxxx>:

It’s a reminder that the ballot ends in 2 days. Please cast your votes.

 

-- Dmitry

 

From: config-dev <config-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Dmitry Kornilov
Sent: 09 December 2021 20:49
To: Jakarta Config project developer discussions <config-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [External] : [config-dev] [BALLOT] Tree structure vs flat structure

 

Hi,

 

Here is a ballot thread to vote for tree structure vs flat structure.

 

Vote +1 if you prefer to use TREE structure in Jakarta Config

Vote -1 if you prefer to use FLAT structure in Jakarta Config

Vote 0 if you don’t care.

 

PLEASE DON”T ADD ANY EXPLANATION TO VOTES, POST ONLY +1, -1 or 0.

 

For discussions use another thread with a subject “Tree structure vs flat structure discussion thread”.

 

The ballot ends right before our next week meeting on Tue, Dec 16 at 16:00 CET.

 

Thanks,

Dmitry

 

 

_______________________________________________
config-dev mailing list
config-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://accounts.eclipse.org