Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing TCF

["Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ah, found it. Cut'n'paste disease strikes again. I'll spin again. Should be ready in a couple of hours.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 2:53 PM
> To: J. Johnston
> Cc: CDT General developers list.
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing
> TCF RSE
> 
> Yeah, not sure what happened there. I see the category.xml is the right
> version, but it tcf.rse never got picked up. I'll clean the workspace and try
> again.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: J. Johnston [mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 12:37 PM
> > To: Schaefer, Doug
> > Cc: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to
> > missing TCF RSE
> >
> > Doug, I just took a look at the cdt-master.zip for the last
> > cdt-master-nightly build.  It has a bunch of TCF stuff, but no tcf.rse
> > plug-in or feature.  Am I missing something or did something not build?
> >   I saw your commit message from build #60.
> >
> > -- Jeff J.
> >
> > On 10/26/2011 12:03 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> > > I also just notice that Juno is off a week due to EcilpseCon Europe.
> > > So our
> > +1 date is actually Nov 7. I won't be at ECE so will do a CDT push to
> > +Juno on
> > Monday anyway. We can update it again on the 7'th.
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: J. Johnston [mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2011 11:47 AM
> > >> To: CDT General developers list.
> > >> Cc: Schaefer, Doug
> > >> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due
> > >> to missing TCF RSE
> > >>
> > >> Doug is this resolved?
> > >>
> > >> -- Jeff J.
> > >>
> > >> On 10/14/2011 06:40 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> > >>> I'll see what I can do. I should really get this cleared up by M3.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Doug.
> > >>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > >>>> On Behalf Of J. Johnston
> > >>>> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 4:42 PM
> > >>>> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due
> > >>>> to missing TCF RSE
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 10/11/2011 04:26 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> > >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > >>>>>> On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
> > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:22 PM
> > >>>>>> To: 'CDT General developers list.'
> > >>>>>> Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools
> > >>>>>> due to missing TCF RSE
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>>>>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>>>>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schaefer,
> > Doug
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:14 PM
> > >>>>>>> To: CDT General developers list.
> > >>>>>>> Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools
> > >>>>>>> due to missing TCF RSE
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi Jeff, this is actually probably a question for tcf-dev.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> There is a bit of history here. The TCF on the release train
> > >>>>>>> has only been enough to satisfy the dependency for CDT's EDC
> > debugger.
> > >>>>>>> RSE wasn't part of that. So if it has been included in the
> > >>>>>>> past, it was by accident.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Now, that'll change for Juno
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> So CDT will require RSE?  I'm happy about this as it makes
> > >>>>>> remote debug launches more user-friendly.
> > >>>>>> I'm curious to know the motivation behind this dependency
> though.
> > >>>>>> Sorry if I missed something said earlier.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Two points there. 1) I didn't say that, and 2) the CDT remote
> > >>>>> launch already
> > >>>> depends on RSE.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The question is where do we put the TCF RSE plug-in on the
> > >>>>> release train,
> > >>>> or any of TCF for that matter. Or maybe it just remains hidden so
> > >>>> client plug- ins can satisfy their dependencies.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Doug
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We don't have any thoughts on how it should be exposed to the
> > >>>> end-user, but we would certainly like a solution in the near-term
> > >>>> as
> > >>>> M3+0 is coming up Oct 28th.  Is there an issue with at least
> > >>>> including it the way it was done in Indigo until you come up with
> > >>>> a better
> > >> long-term solution?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -- Jeff J.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> > >>>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> cdt-dev mailing list
> > >>>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> cdt-dev mailing list
> > >>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev