Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing TCF

["Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'll see what I can do. I should really get this cleared up by M3.

Cheers,
Doug.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of J. Johnston
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 4:42 PM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to missing
> TCF RSE
> 
> On 10/11/2011 04:26 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> On Behalf Of Marc Khouzam
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:22 PM
> >> To: 'CDT General developers list.'
> >> Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> >> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to
> >> missing TCF RSE
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:14 PM
> >>> To: CDT General developers list.
> >>> Cc: TCF Development (tcf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx)
> >>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Juno Aggregation Fails for Linux Tools due to
> >>> missing TCF RSE
> >>>
> >>> Hi Jeff, this is actually probably a question for tcf-dev.
> >>>
> >>> There is a bit of history here. The TCF on the release train has
> >>> only been enough to satisfy the dependency for CDT's EDC debugger.
> >>> RSE wasn't part of that. So if it has been included in the past, it
> >>> was by accident.
> >>>
> >>> Now, that'll change for Juno
> >>
> >> So CDT will require RSE?  I'm happy about this as it makes remote
> >> debug launches more user-friendly.
> >> I'm curious to know the motivation behind this dependency though.
> >> Sorry if I missed something said earlier.
> >
> > Two points there. 1) I didn't say that, and 2) the CDT remote launch already
> depends on RSE.
> >
> > The question is where do we put the TCF RSE plug-in on the release train,
> or any of TCF for that matter. Or maybe it just remains hidden so client plug-
> ins can satisfy their dependencies.
> >
> > Doug
> >
> 
> We don't have any thoughts on how it should be exposed to the end-user,
> but we would certainly like a solution in the near-term as M3+0 is coming up
> Oct 28th.  Is there an issue with at least including it the way it was done in
> Indigo until you come up with a better long-term solution?
> 
> -- Jeff J.
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdt-dev mailing list
> > cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev