Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] [DSF] SessionType

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vladimir Prus
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 2:53 AM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] [DSF] SessionType
> On Thursday 08 July 2010 20:28:10 Doug Schaefer wrote:
> > Is it me or are we really running into problems with DSF-GDB
> > extensibility and customizability? Do we need to take a 
> step back and
> > document all the use cases we're trying to accomplish with 
> gdb in the
> > many different environments it supports and tweak the 
> architecture to
> > make sure we can do them all easily?
> Unfortunately, such a table is not easy to produce right 
> away. For example,
> we (CodeSourcery) will probably have kinda-complete set of 
> DSF-GDB changes
> we would like to support all our debuggers only when our next 
> release goes
> through QA -- and we'd naturally want to get some changes in, 
> or at least
> agreed-upon, much earlier than that.

But we can at least get some needed enhancement documented.
Some of them are not trivial and would benefit in being
mentioned as early as they are known.

and writing enhancement bugs is good too.


Back to the top