[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] RE: Something for DSF GDB feature-parity with CDI GDB?
|
Ok, so this ones moves up on the priority list
:-)
Ling, you originally had plans to finish that one off, how
does it look for you this month?
Thanks
Marc
ouch. that's actually a huge one. Without it, you can't set
breakpoints in shared libraries, no?
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Marc Khouzam
<marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
So we do
have a parity issue.
I'll add
it back to the list.
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Marc Khouzam
<marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Let us know if you have any other issues.
> Well, the missing support for pending breakpoints
certainly
> needs fixing ... ;-)
Yes, this one is a
popular one (it even has 4 votes).
Although, as per
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cdt-dev/msg17353.html
(copied below)
it is not a feature-parity problem because CDI doesn't
do it either :-)
That's actually a semantically incorrect statement. The CDI/MI
integration implemented it's own pending breakpoint solution attempting to
set breakpoints on every shared library load event. If DSF/GDB does that
too, then I'd say you have
parity.
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev
mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev