|Re: [cdt-dev] RE: Something for DSF GDB feature-parity with CDI GDB?|
> > Let us know if you have any other issues.> Well, the missing support for pending breakpoints certainlyYes, this one is a popular one (it even has 4 votes).
> needs fixing ... ;-)
Although, as per
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cdt-dev/msg17353.html (copied below)
it is not a feature-parity problem because CDI doesn't do it either :-)
Back to the top