Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"


I've started to pick this up from Warren. I created

for moving the MoveToLine, ResumeAtLine, and RunToLine stuff to DSF. I've
moved most everything around but have a few more things to do before it's

- Ken

> From: ext Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:33:13 +0100
> To: "'CDT General developers list.'" <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Renaming "DSF Disassembly"
>>> As for the IMoveToLine (etc) implementations, they seem to explicitly use an
>>> MI run control DSF service.
>>> The base service (IRunControl) just doesn't provide the needed
>>> functionality. I think a valid question
>>> is: why isn't the base service being extended to handle these basic debugger
>>> operations? Moving the PC,
>>> e.g., is certainly not a GDB-ism. I think every C/C++ debugger in the world
>>> supports it, so shouldn't
>>> it be part of the DSF definition?
>> I agree.  It would be best to move the underlying service extensions to the
>> DSF itself.
> Cool.
> But we'll have to create an IRunControl2 interface to contain the new
> runToLocation() and resumeAtLocation()
> Warren, can you open a bug to state exactly what you need?
> Thanks

Back to the top