[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Re: 7.0 builds
|
This is something we talked about at the architecture council this week so it's good timing. There are actually two versions to consider, the technical version of plug-ins which should be governed by the API rules, and then there's a marketing number.
I am starting to see convergence that both should probably be 6.1. Technically, we need to start locking down our APIs and supporting our integrators properly. And from a marketing perspective, I don't see the big new framework or feature that would benefit from a major version bump (although Nokia's impending debugger contribution may be close).
Anyone disagree with calling the next release 6.1?
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Elena Laskavaia
<elaskavaia@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I think it should be 6.1 too. We can change it to 7.0 if we have API breakage, but I don't think it can be lower than 6.1
Sergey Prigogin wrote:
+ 1. I also find 6.0.100 confusing and would prefer 6.1.0.
-sergey
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Andrew Gvozdev
<angvoz.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks, Vivian. I find 6.0.100 pretty confusing but that must be just me. "HEAD" might've been looking better but who cares.
Andrew
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Vivian Kong
<vivkong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
6.0.100 builds: http://download.eclipse.org/tools/cdt/builds/6.0.100/index.html
A build against the HEAD stream will run every Friday morning.
Regards,
Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab
Ok I'll update the build script. I can get a build started tomorrow as I'm out of town today.
Regards,
Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab
Doug Schaefer ---07/13/2009 12:05:45 PM---I really don't have a feel for this and probably won't until we have a plan together. For now, can w
I really don't have a feel for this and probably won't until we have a plan together. For now, can we do something clever like call it 6.0.100?
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Vivian Kong <vivkong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We haven't update the build script with the right version number so kicking off a build from HEAD will give you a version 6.0 build. Have we decided on the version number for Helios? If not, what version number can we use in the mean time? 6.1.0 or 7.0?
Regards,
Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab
Andrew Gvozdev ---07/13/2009 10:11:17 AM---Any objections if I kick off a build from the HEAD myself then? Andrew
Any objections if I kick off a build from the HEAD myself then?
Andrew
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Gvozdev <angvoz.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
What is the strategy regarding weekly builds toward Helios? I am interested about somewhat regular builds or more to the point tagging in CVS as we support vendor branch over here.
Thanks,
Andrew
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
