Re: [cdt-dev] Re: 7.0 builds

[Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>]

I really don't have a feel for this and probably won't until we have a plan together. For now, can we do something clever like call it 6.0.100?

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Vivian Kong <vivkong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

We haven't update the build script with the right version number so kicking off a build from HEAD will give you a version 6.0 build. Have we decided on the version number for Helios? If not, what version number can we use in the mean time? 6.1.0 or 7.0?

Regards,

Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab

Andrew Gvozdev ---07/13/2009 10:11:17 AM---Any objections if I kick off a build from the HEAD myself then? Andrew

From:		Andrew Gvozdev <angvoz.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
To:	"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Vivian Kong/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Date:	07/13/2009 10:11 AM
Subject:	Re: 7.0 builds

---

Any objections if I kick off a build from the HEAD myself then?

Andrew

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Andrew Gvozdev <angvoz.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,
What is the strategy regarding weekly builds toward Helios? I am interested about somewhat regular builds or more to the point tagging in CVS as we support vendor branch over here.

Thanks,
Andrew

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev