Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Re: 7.0 builds

I have no objections for now, but depending on what we do with the build system, we might want to do a 7.0 instead. We keep talking every release about blowing up the world there. We ran out of time to continue with that in 6.0, but I think we're likely to take that up again in the next release now that we've got more committers looking into the build system.

Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto
Inactive hide details for Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>

          Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>
          Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

          07/14/2009 01:07 PM

          Please respond to
          "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>


"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>



Re: [cdt-dev] Re: 7.0 builds

This is something we talked about at the architecture council this week so it's good timing. There are actually two versions to consider, the technical version of plug-ins which should be governed by the API rules, and then there's a marketing number.
I am starting to see convergence that both should probably be 6.1. Technically, we need to start locking down our APIs and supporting our integrators properly. And from a marketing perspective, I don't see the big new framework or feature that would benefit from a major version bump (although Nokia's impending debugger contribution may be close).
Anyone disagree with calling the next release 6.1?
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Elena Laskavaia <elaskavaia@xxxxxxx> wrote: _______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list

GIF image

GIF image

GIF image

Back to the top