|RE: [cdt-dev] Question on future debugger interface|
Hi Rick, MI is definitely the easiest way to integrate a debugger into CDT. If implemented it will be automatically picked up by existing CDI and DSF gdb/MI debuggers. But if the API library provides more functionality than MI it might be worth to consider a direct integration using one of the existing frameworks. But it would require a lot of work and resources. Regards, Mikhail -----Original Message----- From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rick Moseley Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 2:59 PM To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [cdt-dev] Question on future debugger interface Hi all, The open source Frysk debugger development team(http://sourceware.org/frysk) is currently debating how best to integrate with the Eclipse CDT plugin. We have been discussing the pros and cons of the two different ways to interface: 1) have an API library such as libfrysk or 2) use the current wire protocol used by gdb/mi that is currently in use in the CDT. The Frysk team would very much appreciate the opinion(s) of the CDT developers as regards to which way they would prefer to see a debugger interface with the CDT and why. Which way would make it the easiest for developers to use? Thank you in advance for your time. Rick _______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
Back to the top