[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cbi-dev] Eclipse CBI Juno M6 packaging
|
The historical development is different: it's not a merge in the Git repository, it has been always like this in EPP because Buckminster is able to use this layout for the packages. Now it would be interesting to know *why* Igor chose a different layout. Maybe he was running into the same problem that you are mentioning below.
Buckminster uses a top-level feature (aka 'allpackages') which references all the package features. Each package feature contains a .product file and references a branding plug-in. That's why we need only two projects per package: One feature (including the .product file) and one plug-in project.
If I remember it correctly, Igor's approach had separated the .product file from the feature.
Markus
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 16:46, Thanh Ha
<thanh.ha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have another question related to tycho.
In the new EPP repository the org.eclipse.epp.package.java.product directory contents was merged into the org.eclipse.epp.package.java.feature directory.
In Igor's repository this was 2 separate directories and thus in the pom files they were defined as follows:
java.feature pom:
<artifactId>org.eclipse.epp.package.java.feature</artifactId>
<packaging>eclipse-feature</packaging>
java.product pom:
<artifactId>org.eclipse.epp.package.java.product</artifactId>
<packaging>eclipse-repository</packaging>
<build>
...
</build>
I'm not exactly sure how to properly merge these 2 into 1 pom. Can this be done?
Thanks,
Thanh
On 03/27/2012 09:54 AM, Markus Knauer wrote:
Hi Thanh,
that's correct, the EPP project moved to Git just a few weeks ago. So every work should be based on [2] that you mention below.
About the packages in question: If you are working with the HEAD in the EPP repository, you are working with the configuration for Juno. There are some new packages (e.g. the Automotive, maybe others will follow), and some have been removed compared to Indigo (e.g. _javascript_, LinuxTools), and I did a bit clean-up (e.g. the transition feature, Pulsar, PHP packages).
Does that help?
Regards,
Markus
