Greetings Eclipse Automotive PMC and Eclipse S-CORE project team.
There is no notion of "handing over" a project lead to somebody else. Just like committer status, the role of project lead is granted after a sustained public demonstration of leadership. Further, I'll remind the team that...
Project leads are responsible for ensuring that project committers are following the rules. At the most basic level, the rules are the open source rules of engagement defined in the Eclipse Foundation Development Process (openness, transparency, and meritocracy), and we depend on them to make sure that team members understand their obligations under the IP Policy and are correctly implementing the Intellectual Property Due Diligence Process.
Eclipse projects are required to operate according to the open source rules of engagement, which describes openness, transparency, and meritocracy as fundamental to the open source process. The handbook provides some
very specific guidance with regard to committer elections.
You have provided no pointers to specific public contributions to the Eclipse S-CORE
project for this nominee. AFAICT, the nominee has made no contributions
to Eclipse S-CORE project repositories. I've found one issue created by the nominee.
Can you cite specific examples from the public record where the
nominee "In Eclipse S-CORE he started to write the Feature request
Security & Crypto."?
AFAICT, the one public contribution by the nominee is a handful of comments on a related
pull request that has not been merged by the project team.
Wayne
