[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [aspectj-users] Re: ajdt_1.3.1_for_eclipse_3.1
- From: "Matt Chapman" <mpchapman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:54:45 +0100
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=irxxwQUYjzrPQuYifX3RMJFhAamSNbREm+XwGDrn5EO6g0t5PWV97Ux0BNB2YJ1ZgRciW3k/XlNa9y1zKW4Fj4uoUeGlWeC6GBRJ0QRDo5T3cunWfkbEkeQc9/sVfJGqjVInWhinUY9DgXa2cPj7ufyDNLRlqefw86InehluPyY=
On 18/05/06, Raphael.Drai@xxxxxxxxxxx <Raphael.Drai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
First, I woul like to thank you for your prompt response.
I saw Adrian Colyer comments and it seems that we are very close to get a
Does it is an issue of ADJT eclipse plugin or AspectJ?
Both - one bug for each.
Do you kown in which release (and when approximately) the solution will be
I hope to get it into AJDT 1.4 for Eclipse 3.2, which is planned for a
July release (shortly after the release of Eclipse 3.2 itself).
It will appear in the development builds as soon as we have something
working, which could be any day now.