[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [aspectj-users] Re: ajdt_1.3.1_for_eclipse_3.1
First, I woul like to thank you for your prompt response.
I saw Adrian Colyer comments and it seems that we are very close to get a
Does it is an issue of ADJT eclipse plugin or AspectJ?
Do you kown in which release (and when approximately) the solution will be
Sent by: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: [aspectj-users] Re: ajdt_1.3.1
18/05/2006 12:48 _for_eclipse_3.1
Please respond to
Yes, this is a long-standing limitation. If you really need to keep
the class files separate, you may want to consider an alternative such
as splitting your project into two projects, one for each source
Also, keep an eye on bugzilla entries 101983 and 46665, which are
tracking the work required to support this capability in the AspectJ
compiler, and then surface it in Eclipse via AJDT. There has been some
progress on this recently, so there may soon be an early
implementation to try out in development builds.
On 18/05/06, Raphael.Drai@xxxxxxxxxxx <Raphael.Drai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi AspectJ users
> I have defined into my eclipse project two sources folders and two
> corresponding outputs. When I am trying to convert the project to AspectJ
> nature, I am getting a window alert that says that AspectJ compiler
> output the compiled files separately and that it outputs the classes to
> "default" output folder.
> I would like to know if this issue has a workaround or if there is a
> that solves this issue?
> Thanks a lot.
> aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users mailing list