Hi,
You can close both elections below for amalgam projects then.
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.amalgam/elections/election-zael-graignic-eclipse-amalgam
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.amalgam/elections/election-matei-gabriel-anita-eclipse-amalgam
When we will commit something on amalgam we will reopen one election if needed.
(But imo I still think that around 40 commits on other Eclipse projects for Matei or code reviews for Zael highlights more than one yearly commit in amalgam)
About EPL, I will open github issue yes.
Regards.
Philippe
De : amalgam-dev <amalgam-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
De la part de Wayne Beaton via amalgam-dev
Envoyé : jeudi 23 janvier 2025 16:12
À : amalgam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc : Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : Re: [amalgam-dev] Reminder to vote on the Committer Election for Matei Gabriel Anita on Eclipse Amalgam
Participation in other Eclipse projects is not generally considered to be a sufficient demonstration of merit for election to a different project. I accept that there may be exceptions, but I'm not seeing that here.
The open source rules of engagement described in the Eclipse Foundation Development Process require that a project be open, transparent, and meritocratic. This
applies to committer elections.
The bar for contribution is incredibly low. If the candidate is ready to be a committer on the project, creating even a single pull request should be straightforward. Or is there a discussion related to the project on a mailing list archive,
issue, or other public channel that you can cite?
There's more information in the
handbook.
While I have your attention... please work with the EMO to update the Eclipse Amalgam project licence to EPL-2.0.
--
Wayne Beaton (he/him)
Director, Open Source Projects |
Eclipse Foundation
|