[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [udig-devel] IP review followup
|
> Thanks Andrea - nice work! Glancing over the spreadsheet I am not sure where
> to start.
The spreadsheet is quite clear, it tells the exact class and the ip
team comments tell what is wrong.
So if you spot classes you know/wrote or know you are allowed to
modify, please consider to change them. Then also mark them as done in
the first column of the spreadsheet.
Thanks,
Andrea
>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On Wednesday, 5 June 2013 at 12:00 AM, andrea antonello wrote:
>
> I was finally able to work myself through the license issues related
> to my code portions and pushed the changes to the locationtech_ip
> branch since I found some discrepancies between the spreadsheet and
> the code. So I preferred to use the loctech_ip branch.
>
> Anyways, looking at what is left, we have a lot of rubbish which would
> need a supershort review by some of the members and some more complex
> licensing stuff.
>
> Can I ask the PSC members to look into the spreadsheet [0] please?
> There are big chunks by Axios, which I assume only Mauricio can solve.
> And then there are some relicensing of copied code by some of the
> initial authors that needs to be reverted.
>
> Please give us some feedback, so that we can close this
> blocking-us-in-the-limbo part.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrea
>
>
> [0]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtOHw31i-Ij_dDVfOHVWQV9lXzVjaFNwR2xpcWF6cHc#gid=0
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
