[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[udig-devel] Catalog / Layer contract, was UDig on Windows XP
|
Morning Moovida; this email is a replacement for your Thursday IRC
meeting ;-)
It seems that there has been a break down of trust between the project
and the catalog layers of our application. I was not aware of this
change when it was introduced, it seems that the project plugin is using
both:
- "layer id" to look up an entry in the catalog; and
- it was also using the connection parameters
There is a relationship between layer id, and connection parameters.
They need to be exactly in sync or the catalog starts getting confused.
I was surprised that this was even possible - here is how it was done:
- IServiceFactory.acquire( id, params )
The javadocs for this method say: "is intended to be used when replacing
an IService entry in a catalog". This method is used by the catalog
framework when setting up for a replacing a moved service, ie it is a
step that is needed when we are about to fire a REPLACE event.
So what has happened is when lazy loading of a map was introduced; maps
were no longer around to listen to REPLACE events and thus could not be
kept in sync with the catalog. The above acquire method was used to
allow these out of sync map layers to fumble along using an ID that did
not exactly match the intrinsic identity of the resource on disk.
This amounts to a breakdown of trust between the two systems :-) The
concept of an ID is no longer trusted by layer to a be a good handle for
resource lookup; this is something we can fix.
I would like to introduce a "IForward" class into the catalog; something
that can be left behind in the catalog when a resource is moved. That
way projects that were closed still have a way of noticing and fixing
themselves when they are loaded. These handles can be used just alike a
IService returned from a search; they can act as a wrapper for the
actual service (so simple code can stay simple), although I will make
them printin warning messages if uDig is being run in -debug mode.
It is my hope that with this addition trust can be established again and
the project layer implementation can be simplified, and made much less
insane ;-)
Jody