[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [tsf-dev] TSF process feedback, part 2: evaluating statements
|
Hi Derek,
On 2026-04-23 19:20, Derek M Jones via tsf-dev wrote:
Without an agreed method of scoring it's not possible
to combine scores to create a meaningful global value.
Something I forgot to mention.
Who is the customer of these scores?
I assume that it is the buyer of the product.
Otherwise this is just another internal management tool.
TSF is an open source project, so technically there is no paying
customer for TSF, or the scores.
Assuming your real interest is 'who are the scores for?', I think with
the current implementation it's mostly relevant for "internal
management" and the engineering team itself, as you've said.
However the intent/hope is to improve the scoring method(s) to make the
scores applicable for more usecases, e.g.
- qualification/progress check for internal and external
safety/security/compliance assessors
- detailed expression of compliance (hopefully an improvement on
"certified vs ISO/IEC xxxxx")
- expression of 'quality'
Given that the use case is not developers, then issues
of performance and time to do this that and the other are secondary.
The use-case includes engineers, so performance is still relevant but
yes, secondary to the (hoped-for) value in the scores.
The end result has to be something that is useful to
whoever is paying for the product.
Agreed.
br
Paul
