RE: [tools-pmc] PMC Calls? Meetings?

[John Duimovich <John_Duimovich@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>he
vetoed his own suggestion...

I did ? man, am I confused  

I'm still thinking the 26th afternoon
was fine.

From:	"Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	"Tools PMC mailing list" <tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	08/21/2008 03:14 PM
Subject:	RE: [tools-pmc] PMC Calls? Meetings?

---

Actually, the previous one neither
I or John could make either so that left just Bjorn.
 
+1 on John being it. He has the
toughest schedule to fit in, especially since he vetoed his own suggestion...
 
D.

---

From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jeff McAffer
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 3:03 PM
To: Tools PMC mailing list
Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] PMC Calls? Meetings?

what's wrong with one of the dates we had before that
everyone but me could make?  We are never going to get all the people
available.  Just have the meeting when quorum can be had and take/publish
some notes.  

Jeff

Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote: 
When you say FAIL, the rules are that you then have to
make the next time/date proposal.
So, John, tag, you're it.

fail. 

-- 
[end of message]

---

_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
  _______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc