Re: [sumo-user] Gap acceptance / Calibration for traffic safety

[Jakob Erdmann <namdre.sumo@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

the value of jmTimeGapMinor also affects the condition in line 637 which causes acceptance via line 657 or rejection via line 655. Thus you should be able to tune acceptance to crossing traffic.

regards,

Jakob

Am Di., 26. März 2019 um 15:36 Uhr schrieb m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx <m.barthauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

Hello,

 

are there any vehicle type parameters specific to gap acceptance (e.g. at left turns)? Last year, the parameter jmTimeGapMinor has been discussed, but from the current source code (~ MSLink:613-657) it seems that it only takes effect in merging situations: The conditions only apply when the variable sameTargetLane is true. What about crossing the oncoming traffic?

 

Background info:

I'm searching for opportunities to tune the simulation given some empirical surrogate safety measure distributions like the Post Encroachment Time (PET). The PET -by its definition- is related to the gaps between crossing vehicles.

 

Regards

Mirko

 



_______________________________________________
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user