A different location could be the Github WIKI or the README.md in the repository.
I put them on the Wiki for now.
— Santiago
Sent: Samstag, 10. März 2018 11:15
To: jaxrs developer discussions
Subject: Re: [jaxrs-dev] Voting rules Hi all, it looks like everyone agrees that following these rules is a good idea. Where should we document something like this? Speaking for myself only, I certainly respect non-committer votes also, and I abstain from hastily ending votings or merging PRs. I have not noticed so far in any open source project that non-committers had been ignored or PRs had been accepted too early. -Markus I guess that’s a very important voting rule about the voting rule! Us user-programmers who are not yet committers or won’t be committers, I guess we can just hope our unofficial -1’s are taken seriously even if they’re more informal. Yes, only committer votes are counted. Does this imply only committers vote? Hi all, I'm very happy to see that more and more people participate in the discussions on this mailing list. And it also looks like there are a few topics for which there is a general agreement on how to proceed with them. Therefore, I think we should discuss the voting procedure that should be used for the project. Well defined voting rules are very important, so we can proceed with concrete actions after initial discussions. A vote is considered successful if there are at least three +1 votes and no -1 votes. We could use this voting rule for both general votes on the mailing list and also for voting on pull requests. What do you think? Are formal rules required? If so, do you like this rule? --
_______________________________________________
jaxrs-dev mailing list
jaxrs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jaxrs-dev
--
--
|
