Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Keep a list of javax references that are allowed?

Should we add the javax conversion exclusions from Authorization to that gist? (After the Spec. committee meeting, these two javax references were identified "javax.security.auth.Policy" and "javax.security.auth.Subject" in the PR. I am not sure if this is the exhaustive list. I don't see them in the Gist, but maybe I'm not looking in the right place.)

The implementations were compiled simply by looking at each Specification page for the product listed with the Milestone PR. Nothing magic though we could present that list more prominently.

-- Ed

On 8/26/2020 5:28 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I put together this list when compiling the Tools Vendor Datasheet.  It really needs to reach the jakarta.ee site and I'm happy to put a PR together for that, ...

 - https://gist.github.com/dblevins/9a6d4b1c90986a4116dd738c9e5ef212

the big question is where do we want to put it?

We have actually a handful of things we'll want to put on the website such as that table of implementations and versions that you helped compile.  We'll also want to list tools and versions that adopt the namespace change.

Maybe at the next specification committee call we can talk about how where we might want to put these namespace-change kind of resources.

-- 
David Blevins
310-633-3852

On Aug 26, 2020, at 5:20 PM, Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

Since there are a few javax references that are going to be required for Jakarta EE -- they are not included in Jakarta EE, but they are required -- should we compile and maintain a list of these javax references which must remain javax?

I gather that wome appear in Jakarta Authorization. I don't know if there are more but it seems like we should do our best to make it absolutely clear, these are not part of Jakarta EE, yet are dependencies of Jakarta EE (i.e. they are part of the JDK).

Is there a mechanism in place already that we can utilize for the small (I think) subset that would be on this list?

-- Ed

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee


_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Ibp9uLrPYhuS35bsisY4fqi5SGE7RruZFaz8KOOw_5JDmNPenxd8pd4OXjJsh7w$

Back to the top