Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Keep a list of javax references that are

[David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I put together this list when compiling the Tools Vendor Datasheet.  It really needs to reach the jakarta.ee site and I'm happy to put a PR together for that, ...

 - https://gist.github.com/dblevins/9a6d4b1c90986a4116dd738c9e5ef212

the big question is where do we want to put it?

We have actually a handful of things we'll want to put on the website such as that table of implementations and versions that you helped compile.  We'll also want to list tools and versions that adopt the namespace change.

Maybe at the next specification committee call we can talk about how where we might want to put these namespace-change kind of resources.

-- 

David Blevins

http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

310-633-3852

On Aug 26, 2020, at 5:20 PM, Ed Bratt <ed.bratt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

Since there are a few javax references that are going to be required for Jakarta EE -- they are not included in Jakarta EE, but they are required -- should we compile and maintain a list of these javax references which must remain javax?

I gather that wome appear in Jakarta Authorization. I don't know if there are more but it seems like we should do our best to make it absolutely clear, these are not part of Jakarta EE, yet are dependencies of Jakarta EE (i.e. they are part of the JDK).

Is there a mechanism in place already that we can utilize for the small (I think) subset that would be on this list?

-- Ed

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee