Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] TCK process draft vote

["Kazumura, Kenji" <kzr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

But, the first paragraph of this section seems to provide vendors an option
that their products can be listed on jakarata.ee without Jakarta EE trademark license.
If I am the only person who interpret like above, this document is ok.

-Kenji Kazumura


> -----Original Message-----
> From: jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alasdair Nottingham
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 8:32 PM
> To: Jakarta specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] TCK process draft vote
> 
> The first sentence of that section says it is self certification and the TCK license agreement lays out in section 4
> what you do for that self certification process. The section in the TCK process is supplemental and necessary for
> a) listing on Jakarta.ee as a compatible implementation and b) use of the Jakarta EE trademark.
> 
> My interpretation is a vendor can claim compatibility provided I follow section 4 of the TCK license, but they can’t
> use the logo and won’t be listed on Jakarta.ee (the latter of which might raise eyebrows of users)
> 
> Alasdair Nottingham
> 
> > On Jun 26, 2019, at 2:16 AM, Kazumura, Kenji <kzr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I’m sorry I may miss some discussions.
> > Regarding the first paragraph of “Certification Compatibility” section,
> > if a vendor's certification request is accepted but they do not sign the trademark license,
> > what can they claim ?
> >
> > It is clear they cannot claim "Our product is Jakarta EE compatible", but
> > is it ok they can claim "Our product is certified by Jakarta EE working group" ?
> >
> > I'm not clear how we should describe their product in jakarta.ee implementations page.
> >
> > -Kenji Kazumura
> >
> >
> >
> > From: jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:jakarta.ee-spec.committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Stark
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 1:08 PM
> > To: Jakarta specification committee <jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] TCK process draft vote
> >
> > I think we have reached the point of a workable TCK process for the first release. The remaining issues are
> outside the process doc and encapsulated in the 3 issues I sent out earlier. We can either vote by mail or in
> tomorrow’s spec call if everyone is prepared to do so.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
> > jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
> > _______________________________________________
> > jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
> > jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
> _______________________________________________
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee