Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Review for approval: Spec Committee Meet

[Tanja Obradovic <tanja.obradovic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Oh, I see. Will add that. Thanks!

Also, please note the google file is shared with everyone, so feel free to do updates / comments over there also.

Tanja

On Apr 26, 2019, at 4:46 PM, Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Tanja Obradovic wrote on 4/26/19 8:33 AM:

Hi Bill,

On 2019-04-25 5:56 p.m., Bill Shannon wrote:

Tanja Obradovic wrote on 4/25/19 7:51 AM:

• Should we approach approvals differently; lazy consensus?

To be clear, this was only approval of meeting minutes.

The sub-bullet for this is

• We’ll discuss on a later call, once we finish javax namespace discussion

As we started the discussion and parked it for the next call, I documented in the minutes.

Right, I just wanted to make sure that it was clear to someone reading the minutes that we were only talking about using lazy consensus for approval of the meeting minutes, not for approval of all the other things we need to review.

I understand that we didn't conclude the discussion.