Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Review for approval: Spec Committee Meet

[Tanja Obradovic <tanja.obradovic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Bill,

On 2019-04-25 5:56 p.m., Bill Shannon wrote:

Tanja Obradovic wrote on 4/25/19 7:51 AM:

• Should we approach approvals differently; lazy consensus?

To be clear, this was only approval of meeting minutes.

The sub-bullet for this is

• We’ll discuss on a later call, once we finish javax namespace discussion

As we started the discussion and parked it for the next call, I documented in the minutes.

• JESP v1.0

• Suggestion for improvements; work for JESP v1.1 tracked in GitHub, https://github.com/jakartaee/JESP/issues

• EFSP

• Issues tracked in GitHub  

https://github.com/EclipseFdn/EFSP/issues

We didn't talk about either of these issue lists.

I talked very briefly about both of these to make sure everyone is aware that we have a place for tracking suggestions for improvements and not to lose these in  email threads. I do not think my notes indicate that we had any discussions on the issues it rather points out where the issues are tracked.

Thanks,

Tanja

--

Tanja Obradovic

Jakarta EE Program Manager | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

Twitter: @TanjaEclipse

Eclipse Foundation: The Platform for Open Innovation and Collaboration