| Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Suggested Jakarta EESpecifictaionNaming standard |
Given that IBM, Red Hat, Oracle, Google and Spring Source (now Pivotal) who also Held one of the Spec Lead positions were all in the EG, it should not be too difficult to get such answer? ;-) Pivotal no longer seems a JCP member, looks like it did not renew its membership, but it is a Solution member of Eclipse Foundation, so it can’t be hard for Eclipse to reach out to someone who has a say there, e.g. Jürgen Höller or others. Werner From: Scott Stark I would suggest that the Eclipse Foundation write an open letter to the past spec leads asking for collaboration on moving the IP over to the Jakarta effort. On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:46 AM Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > Yes, several of us have tried but not been able to get any response from them... > > Ivar > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:23 AM Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Werner Keil wrote on 4/17/19 3:15 PM: >> >> >> Also what About JSR 330, would that remain javax.inject or also get moved over to „Jakarta“? >> >> >> That's a good question that I've been asking for years! >> >> I think someone on the PMC was going to contact Bob Lee and/or Rod Johnson to find out if they were willing to transfer ownership or contribute it directly. _______________________________________________ jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee |