[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Suggested Jakarta EE SpecifictaionNaming standard
|
And they should evaluate whether the licensing of the JSR 330 artifacts
would allow us to move them over even without support from the Spec Leads.
Scott Stark wrote on 4/18/19 10:29 AM:
> I would suggest that the Eclipse Foundation write an open letter to
> the past spec leads asking for collaboration on moving the IP over to
> the Jakarta effort.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:46 AM Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, several of us have tried but not been able to get any response from them...
>>
>> Ivar
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:23 AM Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Werner Keil wrote on 4/17/19 3:15 PM:
>>>
>>>
>>> Also what About JSR 330, would that remain javax.inject or also get moved over to „Jakarta“?
>>>
>>>
>>> That's a good question that I've been asking for years!
>>>
>>> I think someone on the PMC was going to contact Bob Lee and/or Rod Johnson to find out if they were willing to transfer ownership or contribute it directly.
> _______________________________________________
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
> jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
>
