|
Hi Werner,
I believe you are all set up now for access to the whole Jakarta
EE Spec Committee folder. If you still see issues please let me
know.
The folder and documents in it are open to all Specification
Committee members.
Best Regards,
Tanja
On 2019-02-14 9:27 a.m., Werner Keil
wrote:
It’s sad, that what Oracle
had long been criticised for, the proprietary and
intransparent way the TCK was developed is now happening
with Jakarta EE again. And be it just some of those who were
most critical of slow or impossible TCK Access now in
Oracle’s shoes failing to make it available just due to lack
of time and resources.
Jakarta EE is not slow as many often try to
picture it, but some involved wearing too many “hats” and
taking too many responsibilities they cannot fulfil or being
The Servant of Two Masters (Eclipse and Apache) or even more
which stifles the progress, not the progress itself being bad
or inflexible.
We also heard about the JNoSQL issues for a
similar cause. It’s certainly not a problem of my Google
account or that by others, Wayne/EMO was also able to set it
up for different documents.
Werner
Btw, isn’t it a slight bottleneck and risk
to have individual members own such documents?
Once e.g. the TCK evolves, I trust that’ll
change.
Werner
David,
Could you please look into that.
Thanks,
Werner
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Wayne Beaton
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 00:21
To: Werner Keil
Cc: Tanja Obradovic
Subject: Re: [jakarta.ee-spec.committee] Agenda for
SpecificationCommitteecall February 13th, 2019
We don't own that document. Ask David.
Hi,
As
mentioned, if Eclipse Foundation (Wayne) is the owner
of the TCK document, I still get a “No permission
error” on https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eg7nqACM59Ptn6ph20WVifvjkadsI-yfpe5TPUlscx8/edit#.
The
Agenda document is fine. It might be because my
Eclipse or JCP/Oracle identity started with this GMX
address and Google wants the Gmail address (werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx) as
the primary identity. I even added the GMX one as
alternate address to my Google account but seems that
does not help or I was missed with the TCK document?
It
would be nice to get a look at it before the subject
is picked up again in the next calls.
Thanks,
Werner
I
sent out a note discussing a draft of the EFSP 1.1
last night. I will plan to discuss this on our
February 13th call, but do not expect that
everybody will have spent any significant time
with the document beforehand. For now, let's plan
to use the mailing list for feedback.
Hi All,
I propose again, to divide our time for the
call between JESP and TCK.
Having
that in mind our agenda today is
· Approval of
Meeting min Feb 6th
· Jakarta
EE Spec process
· TCK
process
· if
any time left revisit other items
Our detailed agenda and notes are here.
Thanks,
Tanja
--
Tanja
Obradovic
Jakarta
EE Program Manager | Eclipse
Foundation, Inc.
Twitter:
@TanjaEclipse
Eclipse
Foundation:
The Platform for Open Innovation and
Collaboration
![cid:image002.png@01D4C3CF.AFF5B8B0]()
|
![Avast logo]()
|
This
email has been checked for viruses
by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
|
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your
password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec.committee mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec.committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec.committee
--
Tanja Obradovic
Jakarta EE Program Manager | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Twitter: @TanjaEclipse
Eclipse Foundation: The Platform for Open Innovation and Collaboration
|
