Ping?
Wayne
On 12/10/2011 03:13 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
Committer elections need to include discussion of merit. You need
to provide motivation: what has this person done for the project?
Generally, citing a small number of bugs with high-quality
patches/contributions from the individual is enough. Or some
discussion of contributions made in the past (e.g. before the
project was brought into Eclipse).
"Initial Contributor from TaskTop" isn't enough to go on. It's not
enough that the prospective committer's company wants him to work
on the project; he still needs to earn his way in. AFAICT, Lucas
has not created or commented on a single bug.
Based on what I've said, is Lucas ready to be committer? If yes,
then can you please provide justification along the lines I've
described on this thread?
Thanks,
Wayne
On 12/10/2011 12:01 AM, portal on behalf of emo wrote:
technology PMC Members,
This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting for
Lucas Panjer's Committer status on the technology.hudson project. As a PMC
member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My Foundation
portal page:
http://portal.eclipse.org/
Lucas Panjer was nominated by Winston Prakash as follows:
Initial contributor from Task top.
Vote summary: 7/0/0 with 1 not voting
? Jason Dillon
+1 Susan Duncan
+1 Stuart McCulloch
+1 Duncan Mills
+1 Winston Prakash
+1 Denis Tyrell
+1 Jason Van Zyl
+1 Geoff Waymark
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
 
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
  |
