Re: [hudson-dev] [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Committer elections need to include discussion of merit. You need to provide motivation: what has this person done for the project? Generally, citing a small number of bugs with high-quality patches/contributions from the individual is enough. Or some discussion of contributions made in the past (e.g. before the project was brought into Eclipse).

"Initial Contributor from TaskTop" isn't enough to go on. It's not enough that the prospective committer's company wants him to work on the project; he still needs to earn his way in. AFAICT, Lucas has not created or commented on a single bug.

Based on what I've said, is Lucas ready to be committer? If yes, then can you please provide justification along the lines I've described on this thread?

Thanks,

Wayne

On 12/10/2011 12:01 AM, portal on behalf of emo wrote:

technology PMC Members,
This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting for
Lucas Panjer's Committer status on the technology.hudson project. As a PMC
member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My Foundation
portal page:

    http://portal.eclipse.org/

Lucas Panjer was nominated by Winston Prakash as follows:
Initial contributor from Task top. 


Vote summary: 7/0/0 with 1 not voting 
   ?  Jason Dillon
  +1  Susan Duncan
  +1  Stuart McCulloch
  +1  Duncan Mills
  +1  Winston Prakash
  +1  Denis Tyrell
  +1  Jason Van Zyl
  +1  Geoff Waymark


_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton